- 01Cardiac & thoracicSevere aortic stenosis before colorectal surgery
- 02AirwayLaryngospasm and pulmonary oedema
- 03GeneralMyasthenia gravis before thymectomy
- 04ObstetricsMaternal cardiac arrest and resuscitative birth
ANZCA Final Exam Viva practice
Make your
reasoning visible
in the Final Exam
Viva.
Speak through complex anaesthetic decisions while the examiner responds to what you have demonstrated and what remains unclear.
Preoperative cardiac risk assessment
You are assessing a 76-year-old man with a newly diagnosed ascending-colon cancer for right hemicolectomy within six weeks. A systolic murmur was found at the surgical clinic. He reports slowing down over six months but attributes this to age.
- Hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolaemia
- Heart rate 68 beats/min; blood pressure 154/78 mmHg
- Respiratory rate 16 breaths/min; SpO2 97% on room air
How would you determine whether the aortic stenosis is severe and symptomatic, and define the competing cardiac and cancer risks?
How would you determine whether the aortic stenosis is severe and symptomatic, and define the competing cardiac and cancer risks?
I would clarify whether his reduced activity represents exertional dyspnoea, angina, presyncope or syncope, ask about heart failure symptoms and previous cardiac disease, then establish baseline function and frailty.
He describes exertional chest tightness and near-syncope when walking uphill. Please elaborate on how you would assess his functional capacity, frailty and heart-failure symptoms.
Practise aloud, receive structured feedback and return with a clearer next focus.
Choose your examination
Three examinations.
Three purpose-built pathways.
Each pathway has original stations, realistic timing and interactions, and feedback aligned with that examination's expectations.
Inside an ANZCA Final Examination Viva
Reason aloud under viva questioning.
Answer the authored opening question, justify your decisions and respond to examiner follow-up questions.
“He describes exertional chest tightness and near-syncope when walking uphill. Please elaborate on how you would assess his functional capacity, frailty and heart-failure symptoms.”
Review the stem, available information and opening question before the viva begins.
Answer aloud, justify your decisions and respond to the examiner’s follow-up questions.
See how your reasoning and decisions aligned with the viva rubric and full transcript.
One connected product
From first visit to focused improvement.
Choose your pathway, perform a realistic station and turn the result into a specific plan for the next attempt.
How would you determine whether the aortic stenosis is severe and symptomatic, and define the competing cardiac and cancer risks?
I would clarify whether his reduced activity represents exertional dyspnoea, angina, presyncope or syncope, ask about heart failure symptoms and previous cardiac disease, then establish baseline function and frailty.
He describes exertional chest tightness and near-syncope when walking uphill. Please elaborate on how you would assess his functional capacity, frailty and heart-failure symptoms.
You gave a structured cardiovascular assessment and recognised that the reported decline may represent important exertional symptoms. Next, link each finding to perioperative risk and state how it changes your investigation or anaesthetic plan.
Next focus: Link findings to risk and the next anaesthetic decision.
Why CriticalExam?
Don't just practise answers. Practise the exam.
CriticalExam is built for the part traditional question banks and AI tutors struggle to reproduce: performing in the exam itself.
Rehearse the exam, not an isolated answer.
Work through the full instructions, interaction, pacing and constraints as one timed performance.
Questions respond to what you have already covered.
The examiner probes what remains untested, using the time left and the depth expected in your examination.
Written for the examination you are sitting.
Stations are authored around each college's format, curriculum, terminology and marking expectations.
Feedback reflects the performance as a whole.
Your complete attempt is assessed against the station rubric, with feedback, domain evidence and transcript kept together.
When the knowledge is there