- 01GeneralHyperglycaemia with circulatory collapse
- 02CommunicationFamily concern about transfer from intensive care
- 03RadiologyICU chest radiology and acute complications
- 04ProcedureFlexible bronchoscopy in a ventilated patient
CICM Second Part Viva practice
Defend your decisions in the Second Part Viva.
Practise prioritising complex intensive care problems, explaining your reasoning and communicating clearly under pressure.
Hyperglycaemia with circulatory collapse
You are the ICU consultant receiving a 72-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes who has had three days of dysuria, vomiting and increasing confusion. She is drowsy but rousable, with dry mucous membranes, cool peripheries and right loin tenderness.
Temperature is 39.1°C, heart rate 128/min, blood pressure 76/42 mmHg, respiratory rate 30/min and SpO2 96% on 4 L/min oxygen.
- Blood beta-hydroxybutyrate 5.8 mmol/L
Interpret the initial arterial blood gas, ECG and clinical information, and describe your immediate management priorities.
Interpret the initial arterial blood gas, ECG and clinical information, and describe your immediate management priorities.
This is mixed DKA and hyperosmolar crisis with septic shock and acute kidney injury. The ECG shows hyperkalaemic T-wave peaking. I would give IV calcium, begin reassessed crystalloid, antibiotics and norepinephrine, arrange urgent urological source control, then start insulin with close potassium and osmolality monitoring.
Explain how you will prescribe and adjust fluid while managing the sodium and osmolality.
Practise aloud, receive structured feedback and return with a clearer next focus.
Choose your examination
Three examinations.
Three purpose-built pathways.
Each pathway has original stations, realistic timing and interactions, and feedback aligned with that examination's expectations.
Inside a CICM Second Part Viva
Prioritise and defend your clinical decisions.
State your priorities, justify management and respond to examiner questions or role-player interaction written for the station.
“Explain how you will prescribe and adjust fluid while managing the sodium and osmolality.”
Review the stem, available clinical information and opening question.
Answer aloud as the examiner probes your judgement or a role-player responds to your communication.
See how your judgement aligned with the viva rubric and full transcript.
One connected product
From first visit to focused improvement.
Choose your pathway, perform a realistic station and turn the result into a specific plan for the next attempt.
Interpret the initial arterial blood gas, ECG and clinical information, and describe your immediate management priorities.
This is mixed DKA and hyperosmolar crisis with septic shock and acute kidney injury. The ECG shows hyperkalaemic T-wave peaking. I would give IV calcium, begin reassessed crystalloid, antibiotics and norepinephrine, arrange urgent urological source control, then start insulin with close potassium and osmolality monitoring.
Explain how you will prescribe and adjust fluid while managing the sodium and osmolality.
You integrated the mixed hyperglycaemic crisis, septic shock and immediately dangerous hyperkalaemia. Next, make the fluid plan explicit by linking the prescription to perfusion, sodium and the rate of osmolality change.
Next focus: Control fluid and tonicity with explicit targets.
Why CriticalExam?
Don't just practise answers. Practise the exam.
CriticalExam is built for the part traditional question banks and AI tutors struggle to reproduce: performing in the exam itself.
Rehearse the exam, not an isolated answer.
Work through the full instructions, interaction, pacing and constraints as one timed performance.
Questions respond to what you have already covered.
The examiner probes what remains untested, using the time left and the depth expected in your examination.
Written for the examination you are sitting.
Stations are authored around each college's format, curriculum, terminology and marking expectations.
Feedback reflects the performance as a whole.
Your complete attempt is assessed against the station rubric, with feedback, domain evidence and transcript kept together.
When the knowledge is there